The Morality of Abortions Essay examples -- Abortion Moral Ethics Preg

The Morality of spontaneous abortionsAbortions legalization through unconditional Courts Roe v. Wade, has allowed for one in three pregnancies to stamp out in stillbirth. This means that 1.5 million abortions be performed in the United States from each one year (Flanders 3). It ranks among the most complex and controversial issues, arousing heated legal, political, and ethical public debates. The newfangled debate over abortion is a conflict of competing moral ideas and of primitive human rights to life, to privacy, to control over ones own body. Trying to come to a compromise has proven that it one cannot please all of the lot on each side of the debate. M all people describe the abortion debate in America as bitter and uncompromising, ordinarily represented on both sides by people with an intense devotion to their cause, and usually with irreconcilable positions. Many of those who are pro-choice insist that a womans right to abortion should never be restricted, while tho se who are pro-life maintain that a fetus has a right to life that is violated at any stage of its development if abortion is performed. Discussions between both sides are usually very competitive, and sometimes violent, so any attempt at sexual climax to a mutual agreement is drowned out. How can anyone hear if they refuse to find the other side, except to argue? Since the Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortion, compromises that condition or allow abortion have taken two forms those establish on the reasons for abortion, and those establish on fetal development at contrasting stages of pregnancy. The first compromise would allow abortion for extreme, or hard cases, which embroil rape, incest, or risk of the life or health of the pregnant woman, provided not for the soft cases like financial hardship, inconvenience, possible birth defects, or failure of birth control. Compromises of the second type would allow abortions, but only until a given stage of pregnancy, which is us ually much earlier than the medically accepted definition of viability- when the fetus can survive outside the uterus (Flanders 8). Although compromises based on reasons for abortion have been incorporated in laws such as the Hyde Amendment, which restricts Medicaid funding for abortion to so-called hard cases, many people now focus on time-based restrictions. This idea is more realistic and applicative than banning abortion all together since there would still ... ... who are not ready to take on the challenges and responsibilities of raising children. To have millions of poor, homeless person and unhappy children in the world to cope with lifes injustices would be far more heartbreaking than extracting an embryo from a uterus. Abortion is a very complex issue that should remain a personal decision. The layabout line is that each woman should make her own decision based on her own morals and beliefs. Works CitedAlcorn, Randy. Prolife Answers to Prochoice Arguments. Portland, Or egon Multnomah, 2001.Bender, David L. Abortion opposing Views. St. Paul, Minnesota Greenhaven Press, 1997. Carlin, David R., Jr. Going, Going, Gone. Commonwealth 10 Sept. 1993 6-7. Cunningham, Amy. Who Are The Women Who Are pro-life? Glamour Feb. 1994 154-157. Driefus, Claudia., Seizing Our Bodies The Politics of Womens Health. New York Vintage Books, 1977. Flanders, Carl N., Abortion depository library In a Book, New York Facts on Life, 1991. Points, Dana. The Truth About The Abortion Pill. Mademoiselle Oct. 1994 106. Rubin, Rita and Headden, Susan. Physicians Under Fire. U.S. News & World Report 16 Jan. 1995 52-53.